UoM Biology, Medicine & Health vs Forbes
Side-by-side Instagram comparison
UoM Biology, Medicine & Health
@fbmh_uom
Updated 2mos ago — may be out of date
Health View Full Profile →
| Metric | UoM Biology, Medicine & Health | Forbes | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Followers | 6.4K | 7.9M | Forbes |
| Following | 0 | 0 | Tie |
| Posts | 1,102 | 30,257 | Forbes |
| Engagement Rate | 5.95% | 0.02% | UoM Biology,... |
| SocialHipper Score | 89/100 | 54/100 | UoM Biology,... |
| Avg. Likes | 381 | 1,853 | Forbes |
| Avg. Comments | 1 | 55 | Forbes |
Follower counts and engagement data sourced from Instagram API. SocialHipper Score and engagement rate are calculated by SocialHipper and are not endorsed by Instagram.
Follower Growth Comparison (Last 30 Days)
Summary: UoM Biology, Medicine & Health vs Forbes
UoM Biology, Medicine & Health (@fbmh_uom) has 6.4K followers with a 5.95% engagement rate and a SocialHipper score of 89/100. Forbes (@forbes) has 7.9M followers with a 0.02% engagement rate and a SocialHipper score of 54/100. Forbes has more followers, but UoM Biology, Medicine & Health leads in engagement rate.
Want to compare other influencers?
Discover Influencers