Libby Faulkner vs National Geographic
Side-by-side Instagram comparison
| Metric | Libby Faulkner | National Geographic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Followers | 172.2K | 269.6M | National Geo... |
| Following | 0 | 150 | Libby Faulkn... |
| Posts | 1,760 | 31,664 | National Geo... |
| Engagement Rate | 2.31% | 0.03% | Libby Faulkn... |
| SocialHipper Score | 0/100 | 99/100 | National Geo... |
| Avg. Likes | 3,942 | 75,922 | National Geo... |
| Avg. Comments | 42 | 366 | National Geo... |
Follower counts and engagement data sourced from Instagram API. SocialHipper Score and engagement rate are calculated by SocialHipper and are not endorsed by Instagram.
Follower Growth Comparison (Last 30 Days)
Summary: Libby Faulkner vs National Geographic
Libby Faulkner (@libsfaulk) has 172.2K followers with a 2.31% engagement rate and a SocialHipper score of 0/100. National Geographic (@natgeo) has 269.6M followers with a 0.03% engagement rate and a SocialHipper score of 99/100. National Geographic has more followers, but Libby Faulkner leads in engagement rate.
Want to compare other influencers?
Discover Influencers