National Geographic vs Emily Austin
Side-by-side Instagram comparison
| Metric | National Geographic | Emily Austin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Followers | 269.6M | 2.6M | National Geo... |
| Following | 150 | 0 | Emily Austin |
| Posts | 31,664 | 302 | National Geo... |
| Engagement Rate | 0.03% | 1.77% | Emily Austin |
| SocialHipper Score | 99/100 | 0/100 | National Geo... |
| Avg. Likes | 75,922 | 43,650 | National Geo... |
| Avg. Comments | 366 | 2,333 | Emily Austin |
Follower counts and engagement data sourced from Instagram API. SocialHipper Score and engagement rate are calculated by SocialHipper and are not endorsed by Instagram.
Follower Growth Comparison (Last 30 Days)
Summary: National Geographic vs Emily Austin
National Geographic (@natgeo) has 269.6M followers with a 0.03% engagement rate and a SocialHipper score of 99/100. Emily Austin (@emily.austin) has 2.6M followers with a 1.77% engagement rate and a SocialHipper score of 0/100. National Geographic has more followers, but Emily Austin leads in engagement rate.
Want to compare other influencers?
Discover Influencers